05-11-2012, 02:21 AM
This was quite an informative session, though I must say I am slightly disappointed at the answer given in relation to my question. I sensed a minor underlying feeling of doubtful and fearful apprehension in Carla's response and the substance of her reply seemed to mainly attempt to rationalize away the notion of the question I posited and, worse yet, she did not provide the question with a direct answer!
All is well, however. I am very well aware of the answer to the question I asked as to whether a lower density being may perceive a higher density in full without the consciousness having already accessed or evolved to that point and receive frequent and constantly evolving affirmations daily of my initial hypothesis. I am well within wholehearted acceptance of what this notion entails. I simply wished to have a second opinion of enough validity to provide insight into this, hence why I'd originally hoped that I may have had this answered by a higher dimensional source. Good old Law of Confusion, eh?
All is well, however. I am very well aware of the answer to the question I asked as to whether a lower density being may perceive a higher density in full without the consciousness having already accessed or evolved to that point and receive frequent and constantly evolving affirmations daily of my initial hypothesis. I am well within wholehearted acceptance of what this notion entails. I simply wished to have a second opinion of enough validity to provide insight into this, hence why I'd originally hoped that I may have had this answered by a higher dimensional source. Good old Law of Confusion, eh?