04-30-2012, 07:04 PM
(04-30-2012, 06:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 06:33 PM)Valtor Wrote: If you seriously believe that eating meat is negative and you do it anyway, you will probably polarize in the negative. If you truly believe it is ok to eat meat, then polarity is not affected.
Everything? Does that work for killing humans too? Let's try it:
If you seriously believe that killing humans meat is negative and you do it anyway, you will probably polarize in the negative. If you truly believe it is ok to kill humans, then polarity is not affected.
Yes. Now finding a human who truly believes it is ok to kill humans is not going to be easy.
(04-30-2012, 06:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 06:33 PM)Valtor Wrote: We should not forget that Truth is subjective in 3d. "Wrong" and "Right" is subjective in 3d.
To a point, yes, but only to a point. We do have polarizing to contend with, and that works whether we believe it or not.
I respectfully disagree. IMHO polarizing is 100% dependent on intent and context.
I believe the Ra material supports my claims on this subject.
(04-30-2012, 06:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 06:33 PM)Valtor Wrote: This IMHO fully applies to eating meat. Non meat eaters may find it very difficult to believe that other selves truly believe it is ok to eat meat.
I have no trouble with people who aren't aware, but I do have more trouble comprehending that mindset in those who are spiritually aware.
I understand the difficulty in this. It is indeed a potent catalyst by itself on the path of acceptance.
(04-30-2012, 06:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 06:33 PM)Valtor Wrote: So my other selves may judge me on my meat eating.
As we've said countless times, we're not judging those who eat meat.
I understand this. But still according to Ra the simple act of giving an opinion is judging. So in this context, we are all judging each others here. From my experience, this is more so in this thread than in any other I read on this site so far.
(04-30-2012, 06:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 06:33 PM)Valtor Wrote: I know the feeling, I am walking the path of acceptance and every day challenges my acceptance of the monetary system.
I don't think that analogy fits here. We can't choose to not participate in the money system. But we can choose to not participate in the torture and slaughter of beings who can feel pain and clearly wish to not be killed.
We can choose to not participate in the money system. It's a very difficult decision to make, but we can. If I chose this myself, I would hurt all my loved ones so I do not.
I know it's not directly related to eating meat. But I'm trying to put things in perspective regarding the relativity of our illusion.
Each of us have our own path and our own set of biases to work with.
(04-30-2012, 06:43 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(04-30-2012, 06:33 PM)Valtor Wrote: In this thread, I feel a lot of subtle judgments on both sides of the argument and I seriously believe that this brings more negativity to Earth than eating meat ever could.
I find this amazing. Let's try this with humans substituted:
I feel a lot of subtle judgments on both sides of the argument and I seriously believe that this brings more negativity to Earth than killing innocent children in wars ever could.
The killing of innocent children in wars comes directly from the act of judgment. Without judgment, there is acceptance. With acceptance there are no disagreements. And without disagreements there are no wars.