04-20-2012, 03:49 AM
UGGGHH it was painful reading through this thread. I thought SOMEONE would pipe up with Dean Radin. I mean... Someone from this community must have produced this https://docs.google.com/View?id=ddhjsbdd_70cw5kxxd8 excellent list of links written by a LOO fan. Its ok... I still <3 you guys. 
I been reading his book The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena, which is the META data (meaning ALL data) of pretty much all recorded psychic experiments. The book goes through categories of different psi-phenomenon, including the precognition experiment mentioned in this thread, and calculates on the odds against chance. The results are so far for every single category Ive read so far: humongous odds against chance.
Take for example the aforementioned trying to guess the suit on a standard deck of cards. If you just guess, the odds would be 25% that you would pick the correct suit. If you take that example, most of the experiments produced results of people guessing it correctly 33-40% of the time. Now for some reason, to most people, they think the experiment is no successful. But if you subtract the 25%, you have a discrepancy of 8-15% that cant be accounted for.
Video example of this with precognition:
I have read through maybe 25% of the book and it has already proved that several other categories of significance like the presentiment example given can not be due to chance, according to the metadata.
To combat skeptics, they even did some of the experiments in a Faraday Cage to prevent any chance of sensory leakage.
To name some other category off the top of my head for example from the book: remote viewing is a real effect.
Anyways, you can look up pretty much anything about him on youtube and it will be interesting and informative and come from a scientific standpoint.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Radin Wrote:Dean Radin (born February 29, 1952) is a researcher and author in the field of parapsychology. He has been Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS), in Petaluma, California, USA, since 2001, and is on the Adjunct Faculty in the Department of Psychology at Sonoma State University, on the Distinguished Consulting Faculty at Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center, and former President of the Parapsychological Association. He is also co-editor-in-chief of the Elsevier journal Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing.
I been reading his book The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena, which is the META data (meaning ALL data) of pretty much all recorded psychic experiments. The book goes through categories of different psi-phenomenon, including the precognition experiment mentioned in this thread, and calculates on the odds against chance. The results are so far for every single category Ive read so far: humongous odds against chance.
Take for example the aforementioned trying to guess the suit on a standard deck of cards. If you just guess, the odds would be 25% that you would pick the correct suit. If you take that example, most of the experiments produced results of people guessing it correctly 33-40% of the time. Now for some reason, to most people, they think the experiment is no successful. But if you subtract the 25%, you have a discrepancy of 8-15% that cant be accounted for.
Video example of this with precognition:
I have read through maybe 25% of the book and it has already proved that several other categories of significance like the presentiment example given can not be due to chance, according to the metadata.
To combat skeptics, they even did some of the experiments in a Faraday Cage to prevent any chance of sensory leakage.
To name some other category off the top of my head for example from the book: remote viewing is a real effect.
Anyways, you can look up pretty much anything about him on youtube and it will be interesting and informative and come from a scientific standpoint.