In regards to eating meat

[Tenet Nosce]

Because you made 7 "I" statements and 1 "my" statement in your last post. Every sentence, actually, with 2 statements per sentence.

Thanks for clarifying. Then, allow me to remind you that this entire side conversation/circus act was rooted in this statement by you:

I haven't seen anyone dictate a particular diet for any particular person, in this entire discussion. So I really don't know what you're referring to.

To which I replied with quotes from three people, one of them being you. Then, you said that you were too "weary" to respond to my post, and then perform some kind of mental ninjitsu whereby I am getting "too personal" by responding directly to your statement that you haven't seen "anyone" do this, with direct quotes from those people.

How, then, should I have responded to that statement? Perhaps you could offer me a more harmonious way to accomplish this communication.

I can only interpret this as sarcasm, being that in my last post I restated again that I'm not interested in assessing anyone's choices.

The fact that you "can only interpret this as sarcasm" is exactly the energy which is co-creating this conflict. For my part, it is a failure to accept fanaticism.