12-07-2009, 01:20 PM
(12-07-2009, 06:04 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote: The risk you should take to avoid a deadly and disfiguring disease is greater than the risk you should take to avoid a regular flu.
I understand your point and appreciate your effort to differentiate between taking an unnecessary risk for a minor illness vs taking a bigger risk to avoid a serious, life-threatening illness.
If it were a given that vaccines worked, I would agree with you!
However, as you will see when you watch the videos I posted earlier, the very premise that vaccines even work for the more serious diseases is in fact being questioned. Not only questioned, but compelling evidence brought forward that the entire vaccine industry is mostly a scam. Graphs used to show the decline of diseases after the introduction of vaccines are misrepresented - this is irrefutable because the actual CDC graphs are shown, for all to see! Not paranoid musings but tangible evidence! Tangible evidence that the very data used to convince the public that vaccines work on the more serious diseases has been skewed! Furthermore, there is suppressed data showing that alternative modalities such as homeopathy are more effective than conventional treatments! Yes, I am referring to serious diseases like polio and pertussis here.
The point being that the 2 main premises:
1. That vaccines work in the case of life-threatening illenesses
and
2. That the risk is necessary because no other effective treatment or preventative modality exists
....are both seriously flawed!