12-07-2009, 06:04 AM
(12-05-2009, 06:30 AM)transiten Wrote: Goodmorning everybodyI'm not so much opposed to conspiracy theory. But I guess I could take your question.
I'm curious to know if anyone here has visited Jane Burgermeisters website www.theflucase.com ? I would truly appreciate if someone opposed to conspiraytheories did and told me what you think.
Basically, as I said, the whole vaccine thing is two fold.. First of all there's deadly and disfiguring diseases... Then there's the flu.
The risk you should take to avoid a deadly and disfiguring disease is greater than the risk you should take to avoid a regular flu.
On her site Burgermeister as far as I can see is pretty much talking exclusively about the flu. And I think on the surface she sounds correct. However, from it should not be extrapolated that if avoiding a flu vaccine is a good idea that it's also a good idea to avoid vaccines for real killer diseases.
Because that's the real issue. The mexican flu is not a deadly disease... It's a flu.... And the fraud and exageration of the flu is the real crime. Which Burgermeister is rightly pointing out. The vaccine is just a usual vaccine with the usual side effects. Only in this case they're not warranted. At least I'm assuming it's a usual vaccine. I find it highly unlikely that there is nano technology or "deadly when mixed" cocktails in there.
Camelot has been steadily going downhill. I used to love Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy, but they've been spewing more and more nonsense and broken prophecies. In effect they just pass on what they hear... Everything they hear it sometimes seems. I think I still pretty much check up on all their interviews but I've been "face palming" much more since their beginnings.
In short the swine flu response taken by governments and medical institutions would be appropriate if we were talking about a much more dangerous disease.