(02-28-2012, 08:52 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote: I think I misunderstand you. Because from our private communications I understand you to have a husband who is a gentleman and not some sexual predator whom you trained to inhibit his natural behaviors!
LOL! The idea of 'training' my husband made me literally LOL. No, I wasn't referring to my personal relationship, but to men and women in general.
(02-28-2012, 08:52 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote: What you seem to express here however, is often expressed by our civilisation. Girls are sugar spice and everything nice. While boys are slime snails and puppy dog tails.
These however are the same beliefs as "women should not think too hard or they'll hurt their brains"... And "women have a sacred duty to always be subservient to their men".
You have definitely misunderstood me. I'm most definitely not saying anything about subservience. Eeeewwww! No, nothing like that.
The key word here is sacred.
A spiritual aspirant, whether male or female, would view the sexual act as potentially sacred. The partners have different roles to play.
Not lesser. Different.
Quote:87.27 Questioner: Would you do that?
Ra: I am Ra. You are correct in assuming that the energy of which we speak in discussing sexual energy transfers is a form of vibratory bridge between space/time and time/space. Although this distinction is not apart from that which follows, that which follows may shed light upon that basic statement.
Due to the veiling process the energy transferred from male to female is different than that transferred from female to male. Due to the polarity difference of the mind/body/spirit complexes of male and female the male stores physical energy, the female mental and mental/emotional energy. When third-density sexual energy transfer is completed the male will have offered the discharge of physical energy. The female is, thereby, refreshed, having far less physical vitality. At the same time, if you will use this term, the female discharges the efflux of its stored mental and mental/emotional energy, thereby offering inspiration, healing, and blessing to the male which by nature is less vital in this area.
(02-28-2012, 08:52 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote: There was a revolution in the 60's that taught everyone that girls are equal to boys and that all those sexists beliefs are inappropriate. Maybe we need another revolution?
Equal is not same. Men and women are equal, but they are not the same.
The 60s sex revolution was important and necessary, so that women would no longer be subservient. This doesn't, however, change the fact that men and women are inherently different.
And, as with the workplace, the 'liberation' can be taken too far; ie., women became liberated in that they are now able to compete in the workplace. But is it really liberation if a woman must hide her femininity and dress like a man, in order to be taken seriously?
I recently stumbled upon a discussion forum for female professionals. It seemed to be populated by mostly female attorneys. They were commiserating about how they couldn't have long hair. The ones who were courageous enough to keep their long hair had to wear it pulled back in a bun of some sort.
Is this really liberation?
Likewise, are women sexually liberated only if they participate in lower-chakra level sex? ie. pretending that an emotional connection doesn't matter and they can separate sex from emotion just as well as men can?
Or is this a suppression of the very gifts that women were given to evolve spiritually?
(02-28-2012, 08:52 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote: I submit that we are equals.. I suggest that the male psyche is poorly understood by most women, and for that matter by most men. Thanks to the sexual revolutions the public image of women is now far closer to what women truly are. But for men we're still troubled by misconceptions.
We are speaking in generalities. Both men and women cover a wide spectrum of psyches and behaviors, and levels of spiritual development. There are misconceptions on both sides, and in some cases, they aren't misconceptions. We have to take into consideration that humans are evolving.
(02-28-2012, 08:52 AM)Ali Quadir Wrote: The whole orgasm fiasco is really only an extention of this problem. Women are perfectly able to achieve orgasm every single time, providing that some conditions are met.
Of course they are. But it is a biological fact that the female sexual response is different from the male's. There is an old adage from Chinese sexual teachings that may have a grain of truth to it:
(Paraphrased)
Quote:Generally speaking, the emotional component is more important to women than to men in the initial stages of sexual arousal, whereas men are better able to feel their emotions after a satisfying sexual encounter. In other words, an emotional connection leads to better sex for the woman; whereas, better sex for the man can lead to a deeper emotional connection.
So say the Chinese sages.
This seems to correlate with what Ra says.
Note: Post has been edited and added to.