02-27-2012, 02:34 AM
(02-27-2012, 02:21 AM)hogey11 Wrote: mmmmmm semantics!!!
I, for one, would like to say that I don't care what anyone chooses to call it; I love you all and I love your choices. In this case, I haven't seen anybody running around preaching the sovereignty of Ra over the Law of One, so I don't quite understand what the problem is that this seems to be addressing...
am I the only one who sees it this way? this seems to be much ado about nothing. Is the community currently mistaking Ra as being the only source of the Law of One?
I agree. It doesn't matter to me, and I don't think Ra claimed exclusivity.
