Ra material is not the Law of One

[Ankh]

Ankh, We would instead say that the Ra material teaches us about the Law of One.

The group asked us to refer to it as the humble messenger of the Law of One after it was asked whether we should call it Ra or not.

Not sure about the point you are making as what you are trying to say has already been stated in the Ra material. The questioner, Don, asked if it was acceptable for the title of the Book, they were about to make about the information they were receiving from the social memory complex, Ra, could be "the Law of One" and whether Ra could be the author of it. To which Ra answered:

Ra: I am Ra. The title of the book is acceptable. The authorship by vibratory sound complex Ra is, in our distortion of understanding, incomplete. We are messengers.

As a teacher it does not have a monopoly on the Law of One any more than it would have a monopoly on the Law of gravity or the Law of entropy. That is the distinction I choose to make only because many might make the mistake of believing that it is through Ra alone that the Law of One is taught, or that the Law of One only exists as a teaching of Ra.

Again, Ra is an humble messenger of the Law of One. The title of the Books, containing their messege, is "The Law of One".

My personal understanding is that it is up to each intelligence to use whatever catalysts it finds appropriate or suitable for its own learn/teachings. The Ra material may be but one of the many teach/learnings to study, understand and to progress towards the One Infinite Creator. The Ra material may be but one of many teach/learnings towards understanding of the Law of One.

However, the title of this thread, to which I am replying is "Ra material is not the Law of One". I hope that I was able to illuminate what I mean by this post, and the previous one. Furthermore, you make some kind of distinction between people who are following guiding principles of the Law of One, and calling themselves the Children of the Law of One, and those who are not, and these can not be called the Children of the Law of One. This use of separation between entities is as ancient as the ancient history of mankind itself upon this Earth. So, I am personally biased towards the Law of One as it is taught by the social memory complex Ra, or the Ra material: there is no separation.