02-07-2012, 11:48 PM
So this
"The war produced about 1,030,000 casualties (3% of the population), including about 620,000 soldier deaths—two-thirds by disease.[230] Binghamton University historian J. David Hacker believes the number of soldier deaths was approximately 750,000, 20% higher than traditionally estimated, and possibly as high as 850,000.[231][232] The war accounted for roughly as many American deaths as all American deaths in other U.S. wars combined"
is easier to swallow than a bomb in the ocean?
.... cuz "this" is a tiny reflection of murder
"The war produced about 1,030,000 casualties (3% of the population), including about 620,000 soldier deaths—two-thirds by disease.[230] Binghamton University historian J. David Hacker believes the number of soldier deaths was approximately 750,000, 20% higher than traditionally estimated, and possibly as high as 850,000.[231][232] The war accounted for roughly as many American deaths as all American deaths in other U.S. wars combined"
is easier to swallow than a bomb in the ocean?
.... cuz "this" is a tiny reflection of murder