Spaceship Moon

[indolering]

The first thing that popped into my head is, if it's hollowed out how come it exerts such a tidal pull?

Looks like an interesting read, though.  Thanks for the post.

Thanks for your reply.  It's a fascinating read - one learns of the many perplexing conundrums of our nearest neighbor and how only the spaceship moon theory is able to account for them all, while the traditional theories are left in the dust.

The moon's density is about 60% of Earth's density.  This is an immediate indication that the moon is indeed cavernous within - but the moon is so huge relative to Earth, it still exerts a significant pull upon the planet and the oceans.

I always thought one of the best interviews that Project Camelot ever did (I don't keep up with them these days though) was the one with Hoagland and the ruins on the Moon.  Pretty convincing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDEcfohz8xE

I'm not a huge Hoagland fan - I hear him now and then on Coast to Coast and although some of his info and ramblings are interesting, I always had the feeling he's a gatekeeper to the more profound secrets of the moon and Mars.  But thanks for the link - I'll have a listen....

...amazing actual transcripts from American Moon Missions that NASA has chosen not to publicize..

Manned missions? Which missions were these? Where and when were they launched?

The book details some of the radio transmissions and data of the Apollo missions which ran from 1961 to 1972.  The manned missions to the lunar surface took place from July 1969 to December 1972, which also brought back to Earth a total of 400 kg of lunar rocks and dirt.  

Many people have concluded that the Apollo missions were faked (see Kubrick's Odyssey by Jay Weidner) but there's no doubt that the lunar rocks are authentic and tell us a great deal about the moon's composition.  The author, Don Wilson, assumes the Apollo missions were successful and details the anomalies presented by evidence and data gathered by the astronauts and their instruments.

It's true that this data is now forty years old and I'm sure much has been learned since then...but the data collected by Apollo is not in dispute, and NASA has never adequately explained the mass of conflicting and confounding data....  NASA refuses to consider the spaceship moon theory because there is a taboo among mainstream science to admit the possibility of extraterrestrial life. 


edit:
I contend that the moon rocks returned to Earth and some of the data allegedly collected by the Apollo missions were all actually collected by secretive journeys to the moon by the secret space program.