Q'uo: The harvest began in 1987

[Namaste]

At any rate those who are quick to judge others as being judgmental really throw me for a loop! Seriously... people sitting up on their high horse looking down at others for being "too arrogant" or "uncompassionate"... I just gotta laugh at the absurdity of it all.

Noticing traits that are in line with the definition of arrogant or ignorant is no different to noticing traits of humility and compassion. It's only when the viewers emotional projections cloud their perspective that greater distortion and imbalance arises.

As you say, in most cases it's a person's projection onto another.

What do you think of those who are incarnate in which to serve karmic purposes, especially those who were involved in the destruction of Mars/Maldek/Atlantis? Q'uo mentions they will be incarnating here in which to serve Gaia.

Well, as you said, they have incarnated here to serve. Wouldn't that make them at least 51%? Or are you asking about something different?

Those involved in the destruction of a planet will be balancing 'karma' from acts of a high STS foundation. I don't think that coming here to serve Gaia would indicate a mandatory 51% STO polarity.

One can be 80% STS and still be of 20% STO (exclusively towards Gaia, but selfish with regards to other humans and animals). It's not STS or STO, it's STS and STO. They are not mutually exclusive.

Quote...

40.16 Questioner: Just two. With respect to what you just said, would then people incarnating here by seniority of vibration who incarnate in the service-to-self path be ones who would have extreme difficulty mentally with this green ray vibration?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. It is rather the numbers who have distracted themselves and failed to prepare for this transition yet who are somewhat susceptible to its influence who may be affected.

There is also a subtle point on this topic. I know this might sound really nitpicky, but the actual word that is used by Q'uo, and others, with respect to this is "reparation", and not "repair". Reparation means "to make amends with" and so in that respect, I think it is really about healing one's relationship to Gaia, and not healing Gaia herself.

According to my understanding, Gaia is doing just fine. She is not in need of "repair" and even if she were, it would be beyond the scope of anything humanity is capable of accomplishing unaided.

What are your thoughts?

I agree that Gaia does not need human intervention to heal, and the opportunity is moreso for those incarnated. It will still be beneficial to Gaia however to have said entities sending her love and gratitude :¬)

There is a chance that, post 2012, someone could go from 50% STO to 51% STO, and hence make the harvest. That is indeed why they have incarnated; a seniority of vibration.

17.41 Questioner: At this time, near the end of the cycle, how are reincarnations into the physical allocated, shall we say, on this planet?

Ra: I am Ra. Entities wishing to obtain critically needed experience in order to become harvestable are incarnated with priority over those who will, without too much probable/possible doubt, need to re-experience this density.

17.42 Questioner: How long has this type of allocation been going on?

Ra: I am Ra. This has been going on since the first individual entity became conscious of its need to learn the lessons of this density. This was the beginning of what you may call a seniority by vibration.

It could even be much greater, 30% STO to 60% STO. I've seen large shifts in a couple of people around me. I can't see any benefit, or have read any quotes to back it up, that it's impossible to do so post 2012.

Which highlights the differences in our understandings, which are otherwise similar.

Mine: with complete 'equality', all those incarnated have their remaining lives to polarise and balance (or not).

Yours: only those harvestable are permitted experience post 2012.

---

Glad it's helped Duncan. It's been a very interesting 'weeding' session for myself! :¬)

I watched this movie before I awoke because I came on TV late night on HBO or something. It, frankly, confused the hell out of me at the time. I didn't understand what would motivate someone to come up with this concept of children no longer being able to be born. (at the time) I thought, why would they fund this movie (millions of dollars) that is based on this bizarre concept. Now the above quote makes me thinks that all people may become sterile a/o infertile after... when? I don't want to venture a guess (when this would start happening) without investigating this thought further.

Yes indeed, the film seems to hint at something entirely possible. I wonder though, rather than simply infertility, could people 'lose' reproductive instincts?

Myself and my partner, 32 and 28 respectively, are both not drawn to having children, and we wonder if we ever will. I've contemplated it on many occasions.

Perhaps the 'experience/incarnation quota' of 3D Earth is full, and those with intuitive connections realise this at a subconscious level. When you take into consideration the child choosing it's parents, it becomes quite interesting. Do those who reproduce without much consideration attract children looking for a similar experience? In many cases, I would imagine so.