12-21-2011, 10:05 AM
(12-20-2011, 06:53 AM)Namaste Wrote:I've looked at the records too. If you include all quakes > 5.0, the events are somewhat more frequent over the course of a year (worldwide, but not in the US for example). Big quakes (which tend to cause catastrophes), no: Big quakes no more likely than in past: study. Ra said that type of catalyst is random (whether it's related to people's thoughts or not) and conscious catalyst, that which one can use anytime to increase polarization, is always available. I think people know this fact on some level, but tend to get in the backseat and ignore it. Then you have people creating all manner of conspiracies to depict the 'real' causes, and this further reinforces the distraction from work.(12-19-2011, 09:04 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(12-19-2011, 08:47 PM)Namaste Wrote: This could imply that the Earth changes that have gone on in the last two decades is due to the harvest...But what's the significance of that? Have there really been any differences in 'earth changes' from the last 20 years compared to last 100 years?
ZM - I'm not sure, as I thought this myself. If I recall correctly, a research institute plotted the frequency of earthquakes over a considerable span of time, and the conclusion was that we're in an unprecedented period of activity. Need to follow that up with some research.