11-09-2009, 03:29 PM
My path to L/L Research also goes through David. Starting back in the mid-90's, I went roughly in the following order until arriving at L/L Research in 2006:
Art Bell/Coast-to-Coast
Ed Dames/PsiTech/Remote Viewing
Richard Hoagland/Enterprisemission.com
David Wilcock/Divinecosmos.com
LLResearch - Law of One.
I read the LOO in it's entirety like a good novel I couldn't put down. I still follow David's work though as I find him an interesting guy that I can relate to easily. I've never been comfortable with a lot of the "New Age" stuff and the stereotypes it attracts. David is about a year older than me, dresses like he works in the next cubicle, and uses casual language that is familiar to me. We have a fair amount in common. I feel like I could invite him over to play some Xbox
!
I admire that he puts himself and his research/opinions out there. Lord knows I don't talk about this stuff to anyone and would feel pretty uncomfortable doing so. I think he feels a duty and urgency to spread his findings.
I once asked him why he cared about all this Illuminati/NWO stuff when the LOO basically says we're all going to be ok in the end. His reply was that he believes in a previous incarnation as Egypt's human liason to Ra way back, he effectively birthed the whole Illuminati phenomena and it was his duty to right that wrong (balance that negative with positive). The fact that he emphatically related that to me when no one was looking and with no personal gain to be had leads me to believe that he is sincere in what he says. This is not just a means to a financial end for him. Heck, he GIVES away a ton of his stuff for free!
All in all, he is bursting with information obtained from numerous sources which he tries to piece together into one big puzzle. He's almost like a newspaper beatwriter for a favorite sports team. I read his material to see what insights he's finding out that I have no access and/or time to find on my own. Not all of it is of interest to me, and I don't know how much I buy into. At the least, it's entertaining stuff, and at the best, it can be pretty profound.
Art Bell/Coast-to-Coast
Ed Dames/PsiTech/Remote Viewing
Richard Hoagland/Enterprisemission.com
David Wilcock/Divinecosmos.com
LLResearch - Law of One.
I read the LOO in it's entirety like a good novel I couldn't put down. I still follow David's work though as I find him an interesting guy that I can relate to easily. I've never been comfortable with a lot of the "New Age" stuff and the stereotypes it attracts. David is about a year older than me, dresses like he works in the next cubicle, and uses casual language that is familiar to me. We have a fair amount in common. I feel like I could invite him over to play some Xbox
!I admire that he puts himself and his research/opinions out there. Lord knows I don't talk about this stuff to anyone and would feel pretty uncomfortable doing so. I think he feels a duty and urgency to spread his findings.
I once asked him why he cared about all this Illuminati/NWO stuff when the LOO basically says we're all going to be ok in the end. His reply was that he believes in a previous incarnation as Egypt's human liason to Ra way back, he effectively birthed the whole Illuminati phenomena and it was his duty to right that wrong (balance that negative with positive). The fact that he emphatically related that to me when no one was looking and with no personal gain to be had leads me to believe that he is sincere in what he says. This is not just a means to a financial end for him. Heck, he GIVES away a ton of his stuff for free!
All in all, he is bursting with information obtained from numerous sources which he tries to piece together into one big puzzle. He's almost like a newspaper beatwriter for a favorite sports team. I read his material to see what insights he's finding out that I have no access and/or time to find on my own. Not all of it is of interest to me, and I don't know how much I buy into. At the least, it's entertaining stuff, and at the best, it can be pretty profound.