11-15-2011, 07:12 PM
At present, we don't have any scientific basis from which to discern who is who with respect to the necessity or degree of meat-eating. Certainly, most Americans eat too much meat, period.
But science also (of course) overlooks the possibility that the dietary needs of the human body may be in a state of flux. Perhaps what was true 100 years ago is no longer true!?
In my experience, what I have found to be true about making dietary changes is that the ones that truly matter- the ones that stick- are those which come as a result of changes in my state of consciousness.
Although I have found a very clear trend toward less meat-eating, there are still times when I have a craving for meat and I see no real reason to attempt to deny such a craving. I simply observe it for what it is. I will also note these cravings appear to be coming upon me less often.
But to be honest, I view this dichotomy of meat-eating vs. vegetarianism to be a bit off-point. It may be more fruitful for humanity to start thinking more in terms of a land-based vs. sea-based diet.
The sea is amazing, if we let it do its' job. Ironically, the reason that the sea is malfunctioning has largely to do with humanity's insistence upon land-based agricultural practices.
The sardine, for example, is a wonderful and unique food. It is especially high in omega-3s, calcium, zinc, and vitamin D. These nutrients are all hard to come by in food. So it is very convenient for nature to have put them all together in the same place.
A sardine, for example, could be used as a measure of currency. Since it contains a rare combination of materials that are inherently valuable to human life.
In my opinion, this would be a rather high purpose for the sardine. And I certainly would not lose sleep at night over the taking of the life of such an animal.
But science also (of course) overlooks the possibility that the dietary needs of the human body may be in a state of flux. Perhaps what was true 100 years ago is no longer true!?
In my experience, what I have found to be true about making dietary changes is that the ones that truly matter- the ones that stick- are those which come as a result of changes in my state of consciousness.
Although I have found a very clear trend toward less meat-eating, there are still times when I have a craving for meat and I see no real reason to attempt to deny such a craving. I simply observe it for what it is. I will also note these cravings appear to be coming upon me less often.
But to be honest, I view this dichotomy of meat-eating vs. vegetarianism to be a bit off-point. It may be more fruitful for humanity to start thinking more in terms of a land-based vs. sea-based diet.
The sea is amazing, if we let it do its' job. Ironically, the reason that the sea is malfunctioning has largely to do with humanity's insistence upon land-based agricultural practices.
The sardine, for example, is a wonderful and unique food. It is especially high in omega-3s, calcium, zinc, and vitamin D. These nutrients are all hard to come by in food. So it is very convenient for nature to have put them all together in the same place.
A sardine, for example, could be used as a measure of currency. Since it contains a rare combination of materials that are inherently valuable to human life.
In my opinion, this would be a rather high purpose for the sardine. And I certainly would not lose sleep at night over the taking of the life of such an animal.