11-15-2011, 03:10 PM
(11-15-2011, 01:59 PM)Diana Wrote:(11-15-2011, 01:55 PM)3DMonkey Wrote:(11-15-2011, 01:48 PM)Diana Wrote:(11-15-2011, 12:58 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(11-15-2011, 12:55 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: It isn't compassionate toward 3D to say they are wrong.
To say they aren't evolving
I don't recall anyone on this thread ever saying anyone was 'wrong' or not evolving. (Well maybe one person did, but it wasn't me.)
I hope you are not referring to me . I am here discussing because I think this group IS interested in evolving. I am just debating the subject of eating meat.
If I gave that impression, please forgive my poor choice of words.
Well, I would not try to say the person Diana is not a compassionate person.
The ideas of viewing others as not wanting to evolve or that eating meat means that they are not evolving are not compassionate ideas, IMO.
But, the idea of including meat in our diets is one fraction of our total beingness. So, if my opinion of meat-eating is that it would serve a person's evolution to move away from it, that is not to say the person isn't evolving .
It may serve A! Person. It obviously serves Pickle well.
It is a fraction. A fraction I don't think makes a bit of difference when it comes to assessing harvest ability during the indigo ray assessment after death.