10-25-2009, 08:33 PM
(10-25-2009, 03:38 PM)Bring4th_Steve Wrote: Requesting this "protocol" from the source is completely necessary, in my view. In fact I can't imagine why, if the entity is truly interested in communicating, that they wouldn't follow this practice of establishing integrity.
I agree with you on this and would like to clarify my earlier post. I agree that a protocol in which the identity and intention of the source is established. What I think is variable is the format that protocol might take; ie. the sequence that the info is given etc. When I said others might use a different protocol, what I really meant was a different format to accomplish the same thing.
I realize I'm sort of splitting hairs here, but I'm trying to draw a distinction between a set sequence of questions/statements vs. obtaining the same info in a slightly different sequence or fashion.
Steve, you know more about channeling than I do. Do you think some entities could still get past the set of challenge questions? ie. just simply lie?