11/11/11 - What will occur? What DID occur?

[Monica]

1. Cayce predicted many things with precise dates, that didn't happen (at least not in this timeline).
2. Cayce's negative predictions occurred during a time when he was very angry and resentful, so it stands to reason that he was detuned during that time. Many think his readings deteriorated during certain time periods, which coincided with negative predictions.

i think you are taking the the source cayce channeled way too lightly. it is not a 5d entity, it is not a 6d entity, the source channeled was at the point where intelligent infinity is brought into intelligent energy, at octave level. which, is also the level where guardians guard this planet from incursions.

a point way past the point where positive and negative integrates. if there is any 'detunation', there would be a reason for it.

1. If you think Cayce's source was so high, then how do you reconcile the fact that many of his predictions failed to happen?

2. The detuning occurs when accessing the source. The source could be pure, but access might not.

3. The Akashic records undoubtedly have all possible timelines. Please refer to the Ra quote I provided in my previous post. The Akashic record is the store, with the multiple vortices. Cayce focused on the strongest vortex. But what was the strongest vortex at that point, didn't happen. Others did. All are contained in Akasha.

yes. and at what point are we ? the point at which everything happens without disturbing anyone who is immersed in the societal biases of contemporary times ?

As I've suggested previously, an excellent explanation of time is given in The Oversoul Seven Trilogy by Jane Roberts.

i dont even know what this means. i think you are proposing the possibility of infinite scenarios, which is incorrect.

Maybe not infinite, since each time a choice is made, the possibilities are narrowed. However, new possibilities pop up.

For example, there is no longer a possibility for JFK to complete his presidency, since we're past that point. But we now have other possibilities.

else, it would be states as such. instead, Ra spoke of the most likely possibilities. meaning, others are not likely, whether that may be inconvenient for some or not.

Not sure what your point is here.

at no point i have expressed anything as such.

what i have always argued against, was the naivete that believed 'infinite possibilities' existed at any given time, leading to the false belief that 'anything may happen'.

Not infinite. But definitely multiple possibilities exist at any given point.

as for the rules for choosing different 'timelines', i have already expressed the main factor that would determine it. i also expressed it in response to tenet nosce just in this post.

This is where we disagree. I personally subscribe to the theories espoused by Nassim Haramein, as well as M Theory, as well as the concepts explained in Jane Roberts' books, all of which correlate and explain what Ra has taught, in my opinion.

If I am remembering and understanding correctly, you are of the belief that the collective will experience the same reality. I disagree. I think there will be many splits. You might go to one timeline and I might go to another.

That's just my opinion and debating it is pointless, since we won't even know if it happens.