11-11-2011, 11:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-11-2011, 01:08 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(11-11-2011, 11:30 AM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(11-11-2011, 10:01 AM)zenmaster Wrote: 11/11/11: Is Date Tied to the Mayan Apocalypse?
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/11/1...pocalypse/
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/11/1...pocalypse/
I just love how Fox News does things like put "Apocalypse" in the title for effect, then the first sentence says:
Quote:it's a spiritual signal linked to 2012 Mayan prophecies of both doom and spiritual renewal.
Hmm. What about the renewal part? Why does the media just zoom in on the "doom and gloom" aspects? (I mean other than ratings. At one time journalism was a respectable vocation in this country.)
I'd be willing to bet over 95% of writers and reporters at Fox News don't know the meaning of the word eschatology, much less that there are multiple kinds of eschatology. Yet they style themselves qualified to report on it. Just can't seem to see past their own Abrahamic bias... :idea:
Fair and balanced my hiney!! Tell you one thing, so long as Rupert Murdoch is still incarnated, I will take it as a sign that the New Age has not yet begun. (Barring a complete 180 flip in his attitude toward others... unlikely but ever possible.)
Quote:"The Draw of Doomsday: Why People Look Forward to the End"
http://www.livescience.com/14179-doomsda...lypse.html
LiveScience, on the other hand, fails to mention ANYTHING but "doom and gloom" in their article. See- this is exactly what is wrong with science. It mocks what it doesn't understand until what it doesn't understand makes a mockery of it.
I could provide a lengthy list of breakthrough discoveries that have occurred within the last year in the fields of biology, physics, and geology. More textbook-rewriting-type discoveries than ever before in human history.
But, of course, this is all "coincidence" kind of like the lengthy list of simultaneous discoveries that have occurred in science. All pure coincidence. Nothing to do with a group mind.Really it is quite laughable...
Oh and by the way, the same author- Stephanie Pappas- wrote both of these articles. Just in case it was meant to appear as two sources corroborating one another.
(11-11-2011, 11:54 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Does Eschatology relate to the Law of One? Just wondering, since the definition of it speaks of judgment and the final place of souls.
The Law of One, Book I, Introduction Wrote:At some time in the future, then, something that the Confederation has called the harvest will take place. This concept of the Judgment Day differs from the eschatological one in that the one who judges us is not a God apart from us but the God within us. As a result of this harvest some will go on to a new age of love and light and will learn new lessons in a very positive and beautiful density, as the Confederation calls it. Others will have to repeat this particular grade of lessons and relearn the lessons of love.
(11-11-2011, 11:37 AM)Ruth Wrote: I don't know, Tenet Nosce, fire and the wheel were pretty significant breakthrough technologies - relatively speaking.
True. Although at the time there were no textbooks, nor science. Especially no cabal of pharisees... oops I mean scientists... who took it upon themselves to dictate to others what to believe, or what is possible.
Really it is quite laughable...![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)