09-30-2011, 08:53 AM
(09-30-2011, 06:58 AM)3DMonkey Wrote:And yet from one perspective, one must project unaddressed aspects of self onto another for the purpose of learning. Often this results in unnecessary suffering, disease, conflict like war, our money system, and stifled progress. Such a needy state, with self-imposed difficulties, is one which society is living with in the present. Yes, those learning aids are also illusion, but we are here. We must necessarily share in what people think is important to manifest from that illusion - and that includes lessons which are quite unnecessary for learning of all.(09-29-2011, 08:27 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(09-29-2011, 02:00 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: This made me laugh a bit: " In this intersubjective egoless field, everyone is relating to each other in a completely different way, from a radically different perspective, for very different reasons." --- oxymoron. An identity-less field full of identity.How would you differently describe the intersubjective experience in contrast with the ego (separate) relationship?
There is no difference. None. No difference whatsoever. It is the same thing with different clothes on.
From the other perspective there is a shared vision with no misunderstanding possible in regards to intention and meaning, there is basically instant knowledge of what needs to be addressed and who can do it, there is implicit trust. There is no necessity to hide (or reject) from something already integrated. It is 'seeing other self as creator', not as a 'should', but as an obvious consequence or harmonic with the ever-emerging reality.