There is no reason why there couldn't be a good page on the Law of One. The point is that it needs to be written for a general audience without biased language, and should be centered around the normal way people approach books, in terms of human authors and published works.
So the pages should be called "The Ra Material (book)" and "The Law of One (philosophy)"
The "The Ra Material" page would describe the books from the perspective of them being a published non-fiction book in the paranormal, spiritual, and philosophical categories.
The "The Law of One" page would give a digested, community consensus overview of the main points of the Law of One philosophy starting with those considered the most important. It would follow the way that normal philosophies are discussed, talking about how it views humans, how it views the universe, and go over major concepts like "Polarity" and define terms like "Mind/Body/Spirit complex"
I've been following the "Ra (channelled entity)" page for years and Logos5557 basically would not let anyone else edit it or improve it. It was his pet project and in the history you could see him unilaterally reverting any changes anyone made to make it more appealing to a general audience or to provide less point of view.
Logos was pretty rigid in the way he wrote the article and basically refused to conform to wikipedia or social norms in any way. Also he chased off anyone who dared to edit the article to improve it. So I'm not surprised it was eventually deleted.
I have a feeling Logos5557 is unity100.
So the pages should be called "The Ra Material (book)" and "The Law of One (philosophy)"
The "The Ra Material" page would describe the books from the perspective of them being a published non-fiction book in the paranormal, spiritual, and philosophical categories.
The "The Law of One" page would give a digested, community consensus overview of the main points of the Law of One philosophy starting with those considered the most important. It would follow the way that normal philosophies are discussed, talking about how it views humans, how it views the universe, and go over major concepts like "Polarity" and define terms like "Mind/Body/Spirit complex"
I've been following the "Ra (channelled entity)" page for years and Logos5557 basically would not let anyone else edit it or improve it. It was his pet project and in the history you could see him unilaterally reverting any changes anyone made to make it more appealing to a general audience or to provide less point of view.
Logos was pretty rigid in the way he wrote the article and basically refused to conform to wikipedia or social norms in any way. Also he chased off anyone who dared to edit the article to improve it. So I'm not surprised it was eventually deleted.
I have a feeling Logos5557 is unity100.