09-10-2009, 02:10 PM
(09-10-2009, 01:18 PM)Lavazza Wrote: I did not mean to pass judgment so much as speculate, although I see how my wording seemed to imply judgment. Consider it speculative Wink Although I maintain that hijacking a plane as a result of revelation has an STS ring to it, no?
Perhaps and perhaps not, my dear friend, (and forgive me as well if I may have come across as too pointed in my earlier rebuke). Ultimately, no one was harmed, and most passengers didn't even know anything had happened. One could claim "no harm, no foul", but I do agree that it appears to have caused a somewhat malevolent reaction, even if it was possibly from a benevolent source (or he's just plain crazy, which I'm sure is the conclusion of the Mexican authorities). My earlier question still holds, though: If you did know something about a coming cataclysm, how would you make yourself heard? One could argue that hijacking a plane with an empty cardboard box is a fairly benign way of attracting a lot of attention. How you actually convince people after that is another question altogether.
(09-10-2009, 01:18 PM)Lavazza Wrote: I typically hold this type of research / thinking in the same regard as does Ayadew. However so, I am staunchly apposed to close-mindedness with such things.
As do I, and as am I. To be clear, I mentioned the site and the analysis more out of my desire to share what I consider to be a source of insightful analysis of our times, than one to which I attribute any prophetic abilities. The mystery of the future is ever present, but the positioning of past events (admittedly, with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight), is also fascinating in that he frequently points to what are either startling coincidences or indications of an underlying theme (as I would already claim for the attempted hijacking).
In all truth though, I am also going through this exercise to see if the coincidences seem as interesting to others as they do to me.
Ever the student,
3D Sunset