The Detuning of Session 17 and Ra's True Intentions Regarding 2011 - Part II

[unity100]

There is certainly a unification of opposites going on here, which can only be achieved through acceptance.

you are still trying to push equal status for selectively denying information based on preference, and changing of perspective when the information trusted contradicts personal perspective.

they arent. one is just denial, the other is acceptance of uncomfortable information.

you, have called negative infiltration of the material you claimed the trust, exactly for the point you have problems with, when you saw that there was no way to go around that information.

expecting others to accept your mindset of hypocritical denial, is wrong. the only thing that can be accepted, can be a need to deny and understanding of that need.

this is probably the only occasion in which i am able to tell someone that s/he is incorrect, without me risking subjective bias in interpretation, or risking 'judgment' as american political correctness puts it.

i am able to say as such, because your approach contradicts itself. and hence it is contradicting itself, it cannot be correct. it can only be deemed viable when you admit that the proposal you are making - ie the negative influence based on 'transitory-ness' - is valid for EVERY quote that is not saying 'we are all one' in that material.

however you are not able to do that, because it basically would totally invalidate any point in discussing anything in that material, since any information that doesnt say 'we are one' can be claimed compromised.