Ok..will you be putting that response within your searchable database? How did this question/answer not make it into the original text? My original interpretation of how Ra was pointing to session 14 is wrong then. Though the dates of each session all point to the each other anyway, which ultimately must have been Ra's intention. It seems Ra creatively takes advantage of the transitory information requested to link sessions together, and within each session Ra imparts the philosophy of how Orion entities manipulate information.
This is inconsistent with Ra's other statements about Yahweh, so maybe it is another nudge as to the inconsistency of the material? Now they're saying in only that response that Yahweh is associated with Orion and not the Confederation, which is perhaps another nudge in saying how Orion imitated Ra through deception in regards to session 17.
This is inconsistent with Ra's other statements about Yahweh, so maybe it is another nudge as to the inconsistency of the material? Now they're saying in only that response that Yahweh is associated with Orion and not the Confederation, which is perhaps another nudge in saying how Orion imitated Ra through deception in regards to session 17.
(09-05-2011, 06:13 AM)Nathan Wrote: When I'm thinking about Don's work, it must have been really difficult to ask proper questions, he knew that transitory information is weakening the contact, but on the other hand it helps to put things into perspective.You're welcome. I'm sure there are other slight inconsistencies throughout the material.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)