Share your vision for the harvest

[βαθμιαίος]

So, again, you are free to not say. But I still would like to know.

I don't know, and I don't really feel the necessity to speculate. I feel like we'll know soon enough. Whether the time frame is months or 100-700 years, it's still the blink of an eye. I'm not saying harvest isn't important, just that the sudden vs gradual issue doesn't fascinate me. However, I do admit that I'm curious enough to be following this thread (somewhat), but I'm finding my efforts to remain a bystander hampered by your interest in my opinion, and I regret that I'm unable to satisfy you on that.

So we could begin by attempting to define what sort of characteristics that such an interpretation would possess? What are the key elements, or statements, that need to be accounted for?

I'm sure they've pretty much all been given on this thread in support of one argument or another. One example: if the 100-700 year period cannot be accurate due to the volatility of our peoples, doesn't that imply that our peoples (ie 3D natives, not just dual-bodied entities) would still be here in 100-700 years, according to the possibility/probability vortices visible to Ra in 1981?

So I am not one to be content with just taking everything at face value and proclaiming myself as to be so utterly small minded as to not be able to understand the larger meaning, even if there is one.

I don't see that the question of sudden vs gradual harvest has any larger meaning. It's mechanical, as has been pointed out many times.

So getting back to the age-old quote, if Ra says that the earth was in fourth density in 1981, then either it actually WAS in fourth density in 1981 OR Ra was wrong.

What I see happening sometimes (and I could possibly be wrong myself) is that somebody is too timid or afraid to come right out and say that Ra was wrong in their opinion. Therefore all manner of contrivances are made to try to piece things together in a somewhat incoherent way. This detracts from the overall potential of the experience we are having here.

When I first read the material I decided/realized that I needed to take it as a whole: either accept it all or reject it all. Perhaps that was and is unsophisticated and undiscerning of me, but oh well. The material rings true to me on so many levels that I do accept it as a whole. I recognize that's not the case for everyone, though.