08-31-2011, 10:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-31-2011, 10:03 PM by Bring4th_Austin.)
(08-31-2011, 09:33 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: This might throw another monkey wrench into the works, but depending upon the true intention of this statement, it may be necessary to be incarnated in order to be harvested.
That would explain this:
34.18 Wrote:Questioner: Do we have enough time for me to ask if the death, almost immediately after the cessation of war, of this entity could have been so that it could have immediately been reincarnated so that it could make harvest?
Ra: I am Ra. This is precisely correct.
In any case, it is interesting looking back through the material on a search for the word "harvest". Surprisingly, most of the queries are directed toward negative harvests, harvests on other planets, or harvests in other densities. There is actually very little to go on regarding our own harvest. Ah, such is life.
That conversation regarding Patton was very specifically about the fact that he had not polarized to harvestability within that incarnation. He had to reincarnate to polarize before harvest. That was the basis of this question, not the idea that it was required to be in incarnation to be harvested.
(08-31-2011, 09:51 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Wait, wait, wait. Everybody hold their horses and 3DM hold on to your Tarot deck.
zenmaster Wrote:The entity dies, gets harvested, and reincarnates somewhere.
abridgetoofar Wrote:It happens after they die....
On what basis is the claim being made that one must be disincarnate to be harvested?
This is exactly the info that Unity yelled at me for not gathering from the rest of the thread...the fact that one must be not in incarnation, in time/space, to be harvested. Reviewing Unity's posts will give you some answers.
_____________________________
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.
The only frontier that has ever existed is the self.