Share your vision for the harvest

[unity100]

polarization being based on one life is not possible. the entity cannot be isolated from the spiritual biases it gained through its journey from 1d to 3d end. these even follow the entity not only to after death, but to even other 3d planets or even 4d planet after harvest. we can conclude this from the distillation of the core of experiences after death talk in regard to physical death in 3d.

But that's not what I've been suggesting. The biases are going to be there, regardless. The particular life lessons will be in those areas that need the most work.

seems logical, however when we look at the anomaly harvest introduces to death process, a harvest after death happens immediately by being placed into violet body, and the entity goes to indigo body only after harvesatbility is gauged, and then review and decision of next incarnation happens.

it seems, review of life lessons is not necessary for harvest in time/space. this is curious.

This automatic movement to the true-color locus in space/time and time/space is 'the harvest'. The entity is attracted by a compelling resonance. The review is not just the life review, but the whole view and assessment of what needs balancing or healing. At the new 'frequency', with that added 'support system' the entity can determine how to make best use of the next incarnation, based on assessment of from the whole (time/space) viewpoint. Beginning 4D is much like end of 3D, you choose your new parents. But I'd imagine one would be meeting a great number of entities of foreign appearance which will soon, for the first time, have a new ape-body physiology to get used to. One question is, why did they leave their logos?

im at a loss to even see the basis of what you are saying above. it is clearly said that during harvest the entity is immediately placed into violet body upon death. no kind of review happens. if it was a 'grand review' like you interpret, there wouldnt be a need to again be placed into indigo and review and decide for incarnation.

..................

i want to reiterate the below post to emphasize some newfound pointers :

I know, I was being general for the sake of brevity. I understand the process of harvest itself, how it occurs after death etc.

there is no obligation for harvest happening after death. contact with intelligent infinity in incarnation, it seems, a more surefire harvest in regard to definite harvestability. notice, how the concept 'judging of harvestability of entity' gets into play in a harvest that happens after incarnation with entity being placed in violet ray body. there is a judgment happening there, probably by the harvesters. however, for the case of contacting intelligent infinity during incarnation, no such mentions were made. it seems, contacting intelligent infinity during incarnation is a definite proof of harvestable violet balance.

in addition, it seems the word 'harvesting' and 'harvested' seem to be used also for cases of entities being taken away from the planet or leaving - for those who harvested themselves, concept 'harvested themselves' gets used. for those who achieved infinite intelligence contact during incarnation but not died (including 150 harvestable entities and the negatives in this period) harvestable phrase is used.

reflecting back on the below quote :

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...c=1&ss=1#5

two entities are named as 'may be harvestable in negative sense'. this is, despite these entities were dead for about 40 years by then.

other entities were named as not harvested themselves, but in incarnation still.

rasputin was named as harvested himself.

it is possible that the other entities have not attained intelligent infinity contact during incarnation, as the below shows :

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...=1&ss=1#25

it seems then, harvest concept is used as not only for infinite intelligence contact, but also the process of an entity dying, and leaving the 3d plane.

this bodes rather important conclusions for gradualist proposals, since it is said that 'all entities are harvested regardless of progress at the end of last cycle', and the two entities named from third reich were still waiting for harvest for their harvestability to be gauged during harvest. (because they apparently didnt attain intelligent infinity contact during incarnation - if they did, they would immediately leave the planet as other negatives do - which was told as a thumb rule for self-harvests of negative nature By the way).

In regards to mentioning the positive harvest of the planet itself, I thought I recall Ra mentioning how the negatives were trying to dominate and garner control of the planet itself, trying to turn it into a negative locale so to speak, and that this wasn't successful.

that was not named as harvest of a planet.

'may be harvestable negatively' wordage is used for goering and himmler. and some other number of entities in incarnation. both goering, and himller were dead circa 1981. with the 'gradual harvest that started with green vibrations' and so on proposition, or, 'harvest is transition to 4d' proposition, these entities should have been named as harvested, or, in the process of being harvested by 1981.

instead they are named as possibly harvestable. the others too. this tells us that harvest is not something that is related to 'transition into 4d vibration', or, something that is gradual and started before 1981.

we also understand that these entities did not contact intelligent infinity. otherwise, they would be named as harvestable or, in their case since they would immediately choose to leave the planet through death, harvested.

instead, they were apparently waiting for harvest circa 1981.