'Controversial' study about possible ETI contact scenarios

[Bring4th_Austin]

The Law to maintain Confusion and the Law to respect Free Will. Maintain ignorance in order to provide choice.

Okay. Why? For what purpose would a choice made from ignorance benefit anyone?

I believe to maintain the idea of equality, oneness, or unity throughout creation. Guiding someone completely and influencing their choices will inevitably make you seem like a leader, someone to be trusted over one's own intellect and intuition, inevitably worshiped in some fashion. This is not congruent with the STO path.

Also, removing the option of choice eliminates a big part of the experience of the Creator knowing itself. It defeats any unimagined possibilities and stunts the growth of creation. Allowing others to make their own decisions without influence allows for infinitely more possibilities.

If Free Will is absolute and I existed as an entity, I would not choose to be subjected to the Law of Confusion; neither would I need to continue within subjection to the Law of Confusion.... I would simply Will my way out.

This is why I maintain that Free Will is a mysterious spiritual inheritance. IMO, it is a mind complex creation to label the nature of the spirit complex.

My mind is having a tough time absorbing this. Is upholding the Law of Confusion where it is not desired considered an infringement of free will? Of course, saying that you wish to will your way out of the Law of Confusion is the same as saying you wish to will your way out of the Law of Free Will, and allowing another to take control of your will.