08-26-2009, 05:22 PM
I think you answered their question properly C-Jean. I personally would not invest more in it than this. My position is, if the Wikipedia wants to remove Ra, let them, they're not the only source. As you've now shown ![Wink Wink](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.png)
Logos5557 kind of attacks you. I would not accept his invitation for conflict. A sock puppet is someone who logged in under multiple accounts in order to make his single opinion seem shared by multiple individuals. Ignore it, the wiki crew can check your ip adress and see that this is not the case and there's no point in bickering and the more mature you come across the better.. If the sock puppet argument continues, just tell them to check ip adresses and see for themselves.
However, I'd recommend against multiple people logging in flooding this article with opinions. It will only confuse the matter. And make the sock puppet accusation seem more likely. You put your arguments in politely and directly answered the objections. I will monitor the article regularly and put my comments here. I think it's best for our opinions to go through you in order to do this politely and coherently.
If we'd all show up it might end up looking like you brought your family over for a troll war!
Also there's a chance one of us n00bs accidentally deletes information that can be brought back but won't help the situation. Replying there is a bit more complicated than the average forum reply.
As the Law of One material gains more momentum, as it is clearly doing, and if the page is deleted, then eventually someone will start a new page. The discussion will start again and it will be even less deniable than now. In the end there is no doubt there will be a Law of One wikipedia page.![Wink Wink](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.png)
Don't invest too much in "winning or losing" just answer their objections or questions politely precisely and factually then see what happens. Leave out the irrelevant. And let the decision be theirs as it is. Either outcome is not a big thing for the Law of One movement imho... It had not even occurred to me personally to look at the wikipedia for Law of One information.
Anyway, that's my two cents. Thank you for taking a stand for the Law of One. If success can't be had today it will be another day. And it will be the little pushes from people like you that made the difference. All the other more comprehensive sources will be very available to seekers in the mean time.
![Wink Wink](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.png)
Logos5557 kind of attacks you. I would not accept his invitation for conflict. A sock puppet is someone who logged in under multiple accounts in order to make his single opinion seem shared by multiple individuals. Ignore it, the wiki crew can check your ip adress and see that this is not the case and there's no point in bickering and the more mature you come across the better.. If the sock puppet argument continues, just tell them to check ip adresses and see for themselves.
However, I'd recommend against multiple people logging in flooding this article with opinions. It will only confuse the matter. And make the sock puppet accusation seem more likely. You put your arguments in politely and directly answered the objections. I will monitor the article regularly and put my comments here. I think it's best for our opinions to go through you in order to do this politely and coherently.
If we'd all show up it might end up looking like you brought your family over for a troll war!
![Smile Smile](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/smilies/smile2.png)
As the Law of One material gains more momentum, as it is clearly doing, and if the page is deleted, then eventually someone will start a new page. The discussion will start again and it will be even less deniable than now. In the end there is no doubt there will be a Law of One wikipedia page.
![Wink Wink](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.png)
Don't invest too much in "winning or losing" just answer their objections or questions politely precisely and factually then see what happens. Leave out the irrelevant. And let the decision be theirs as it is. Either outcome is not a big thing for the Law of One movement imho... It had not even occurred to me personally to look at the wikipedia for Law of One information.
Anyway, that's my two cents. Thank you for taking a stand for the Law of One. If success can't be had today it will be another day. And it will be the little pushes from people like you that made the difference. All the other more comprehensive sources will be very available to seekers in the mean time.