07-30-2011, 09:42 AM
Questioner: Why is the negative path so much more difficult to attain harvestability upon than the positive?
Ra: I am Ra. This is due to a distortion of the
Law of One which indicates that the gateway to intelligent infinity be a
gateway at the end of a straight and narrow path as you may call it. To
attain fifty-one percent dedication to the welfare of other-selves is
as difficult as attaining a grade of five percent dedication to
otherselves. The, shall we say, sinkhole of indifference is between those two.
Okay, but my experience is on the positive path, and it has not been easy. For me, the level of dedication required has been extraordinarily difficult at times. The one thing Ra mentioned as crucial is self-honesty. For the negative path, it requires dedication to service-to-self at the expense of all else. Even Hitler with his dedication and commitment to the elitism and enslavement apparently fell due to his inner belief that what he was doing was for the good of humanity, which was misguided for an STS candidate. What I'm trying to say is that either path is difficult to the point that most people will not make it, even many of those who show a strong inclination to positive. But I would not call them STS.
Ra: I am Ra. This is due to a distortion of the
Law of One which indicates that the gateway to intelligent infinity be a
gateway at the end of a straight and narrow path as you may call it. To
attain fifty-one percent dedication to the welfare of other-selves is
as difficult as attaining a grade of five percent dedication to
otherselves. The, shall we say, sinkhole of indifference is between those two.
Okay, but my experience is on the positive path, and it has not been easy. For me, the level of dedication required has been extraordinarily difficult at times. The one thing Ra mentioned as crucial is self-honesty. For the negative path, it requires dedication to service-to-self at the expense of all else. Even Hitler with his dedication and commitment to the elitism and enslavement apparently fell due to his inner belief that what he was doing was for the good of humanity, which was misguided for an STS candidate. What I'm trying to say is that either path is difficult to the point that most people will not make it, even many of those who show a strong inclination to positive. But I would not call them STS.