07-24-2011, 08:45 PM
(07-24-2011, 02:04 PM)Azrael Wrote: I'm with you Monkey, I don't feel infinity is the end all.
end, and beginning are just concepts with their exact opposite counterparts within the existing parts of infinity, and therefore they are also invalid for describing it.
Quote:I see your point, with Infinity being a maximal state, however what you've described is infinity only as an idea. If Infinity is above Infinite Intelligence then how has Intelligence been established?
that is a good question. infinity 'becoming' intelligent in lower level, would mean that there is a complementary counterpart to infinite intelligence.
'how has it been established' -> separation of infinite intelligence and its opposite complementary counterpart.
Quote:Also, I would remind you that true simultaneity DOES exist, so stating that two concepts "nullify" eachother is in fact false, because within Infinity they co-exist happily. I don't believe in this kind of "cancellation" of concepts, especially not when considering Infinity! The way I see it, you're taking the "glass half full" approach. Rather, I think that if you accumulate everything together it is in fact ALL true, and there is no Untruth to be found.
the existence of something is only evident and real with its effect. if, entire effect of something, even a concept, is totally and utterly nullified, than that concept/thing can not exist. it is nonexistent.
things can exist, only as long as they are separate with their complementary counterparts.
Quote:I would ask you where you came to your conclusions of the "levels" of infinity, and I'm curious as to how Infinity came to be. If Infinity encompasses both existence and non-existence (whatever THAT is...) it must have some purpose.
'purpose' and 'purposelessness' are also things that complement each other. none is valid for infinity.
and the conclusion is easy and straightforward once you start thinking incessantly about infinity.
Quote: Perhaps describing it visually is futile considering our low dimension and rather a description via function is more appropriate, ergo the misnomer The One Infinite Creator, or the Source. Hm?
misnomer of course, because anything with an adjective cannot be infinity. if, the 'creator' was infinite, it would not be creating, and it would have created everything and it would have destroyed everything. since it is in a process of creating, it is not infinite. it can only be said that, it is infinite in regard to time and space - which in turn are just concepts in infinity.
...................
'eternal mystery' is a good, however still totally invalid description for infinity.