More Positive but Less Harvestable

[Tenet Nosce]

Yes. It seems to be that the "war" is completely fought by lobbying the entities in the 'Choice phase' as though each battle is simply an attempt to sway the 'Choice makers (3D entities)'.

Right. Now how can an entity make a true choice if they aren't presented with all the pertinent information?

I think I'm just trying to say that this research and development is a real look at what the 'mind' is and Tenet Nosce is doing a great job at researching the points that make the actual material not separate from a very example of the Mind as the material is itself.

Thanks! I am happy to hear that I have been of service.

LOL, now that I have clicked the link it is my assumption that you actually endorse laughing at the article in full disbelief. (my distortions) Perhaps you should revise your disclaimer if you intend to agree with a tiny bit of it. L O L !!!!

I already had. I went back and underlined necessarily.

David Wilcock actually did some extremely stellar research into a scientific basis for spiritual growth and human potential back in the day. This research (in my opinion) got derailed into a "mission" to be a harbinger of ET disclosure.

Consider this quote I dug up on a Google search for "don elkins suicide":

Any researcher trying to draw comparisons between my life and those of the Law of One team, be advised... I was the first person to live in Don Elkins' room after he committed suicide, nearly 20 years later. I pick up ALL the energies off of the areas I sleep in whether I want to or not. I slept on the "Ra Bed" that the original Law of One readings were done off of for the first month I was there. All the frozen suicide thoughtforms in Don's room greeted me very strongly - the second or third night I slept in there I had a terrifying dream where gov. spooks shot my head off and I was in my astral body, trying to move my arms to feel if I still had a head. I didn't even take Don's original decorations off the wall and repaint to claim the room as my own until a month into the process.

... and here is an interesting take on the whole situation framed in a query to the Cassiopean contact:

Q: I have been having a dialogue with a fellow on the net in the last week or so who is very well versed in the Ra Material. He sent me a large chunk of volume 5 of the Ra books, which was material that had not been released earlier. It seems that during the times that Don Elkins was asking some questions about different conspiracies and the nature of the 4th density STS manipulations and some other rather grim subjects, there was some sort of judgment made by this group, or members of this group, that such subjects were not appropriate lines of questioning for an STO channel. They were, apparently, considered to be a "focusing on negative aspects," therefore they were not of "love and light." Such questions and directions of questions were, therefore, discouraged or agreed by this group to be not desirable to pursue. Don Elkins DID, however, commit suicide. Can you tell us why?

A: Suicide is a chosen pathway for the purpose of close realization of shutting off the noise.

Q: I would like to understand. Here, these folks had this marvelous contact with Ra...

A: Contact with Ra does not preclude the possibility of attack.

Q: Why did Ra not convey to him the information necessary to understand that he was under attack, and what kind of attack it was, and how to deal with it?

A: The questions were not asked.

Q: Why were the questions not asked that would have protected him?

A: "Love and Light" focus.

Q: So, because they were so focused on the love and light aspects...

A: There is no positivity without negativity. There is always negativity present, whether acknowledged or not.

Q: So, you are saying that if it is not acknowledged, placed on the table, so to speak, that it sort of "bites you" no matter what? That, in some way it will manifest, and if a person goes to an extreme in terms of love and light, the negativity will come in the back door?

A: Close.

Now this is very close to what I have conceived in my own mind. The interesting thing is... I just came across this quote for the first time several days ago. Quite the "coincidence", no?

Anyhow, as near as I can tell, from both reading and personal experience, when one opens the gateway to intelligent infinity, they receive both a positive and a negative greeting. Of course, not too many negatives are going to come right out and state their true intentions, but instead disguise themselves as a positive contact.

Typically this involves a suggestion of a particular "life mission" (Assigned by... whom, exactly?) and some sort of ego massaging in order to get a person to accept that they are a master, guru, avatar, or some other "special" category of being that is here to "serve" others.

If the neophyte is not sufficiently trained in wise discernment, this is very risky business. Oh, and by the way, it is entirely possible to simply acknowledge both the greetings and then kindly request that they step aside so that you may pass.