07-22-2011, 03:24 PM
(07-20-2011, 02:35 AM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(07-19-2011, 10:40 PM)unity100 Wrote: probably the minority accepted the common feeling of the overall majority, including theirs.
That's too paradoxical for me to comprehend. If there was/is a difference of opinion, by what means would it be reconciled?
4d and on positive, entities are increasingly harmonizing with each other. overriding and acting against another's feelings becomes increasingly disliked. the group would harmonize the overall result according to strength of everyone's feelings.
Quote:A sufficiently trained and aware being could induce a dream-like hallucinatory experience in another such that they would be unable to discern between true and false physicality, given enough difference in polarity. A plethora of examples are given by "ET" abductee testimony.
that has no relevance or bearing in this argument. a hallucination doesnt need to hide behind a cloud. also much more effective hallucinations than a burning object in the sky could have projected if it was a hallucination. 'wheel within wheel' and burning object, burning bush are in themselves not to well or relevant impressions.
Quote:I acknowledge the potential folly in attempting to control the natural flow of energy through the "chokepoint" of limited identity. However, my query is directed otherwise.
I will restate: Is the "calling" a required waypoint through which all 3D entities must pass, or may an 3D entity polarize without any such appeal to higher density realities. In other words, may a materialistic atheist polarize positively, and if so, how?
in general, 'calling' is something that happens continuously, and it is basically the entity's striving towards the light up above (all the way since 2d). you basically constantly call whatever vibration you are striving towards up ahead.
the 'appeal' to higher densities is constant - what you name as higher density, is the part of creation that constitutes particular array of vibrations pertaining to that density. the energy, vibration etc etc doesnt come from nowhere.
a materialistic atheist may polarize positively, unconsciously, if s/he is concerned with well being of others increasingly. however, in the background, s/he will be using whatever energy s/he is striving towards, and that will also be whatever particular flavor/model of that energy s/he is attracted to.
contrary is also possible. a religious entity may polarize negatively in background, while claiming or thinking that s/he is polarizing positively.
resonating with energies knowingly and consciously is the realm of the adepts.
Quote:True. My query is: If a given 5D entity is lightyears away living in their own sphere of influence, what purpose would such an entity have in attuning itself to such a distant call? In other words, given the far flung reaches of the galaxy... why Earth and why now?
This would presuppose that the immediate sphere of influence of the 5D entity is not capable of providing a means to fulfill its desires.
law of attraction. doesnt matter how far away. even if the attraction is not obeyed or fulfillable, attraction will still be there. it will be attempt to get filled through other means.
the reason is simple - vibration models attract whatever they are attracting.
Quote:unity100 Wrote:i see this system as exceedingly wrong.Tenet Nosce Wrote:Wrong? To what standard of conduct would one be able to adjudicate its "wrongness"? Perhaps you mean ineffective?Please respond.
hampering the natural flow of energies in between conscious and subconscious intentionally, then, trying to facilitate flow of energies in between conscious and subconscious through mechanical means, is exceedingly wrong.
its like first demolishing a building and then trying to patch it up to stand with bandaids.