07-22-2011, 07:29 AM
That follow-up was related to the fallibility of the stellar/galactic evolution model currently in use, and the fact that Larson suggested a more accurate model decades ago. Isn't it amazing that something can be 5 times younger than previously thought and go unnoticed? That's a 'broken' cosmology.
As far as Ra being fallible, sure. To merely put concepts to words is to necessarily, automatically become fallible. The key or art with effective communication is to reduce the chance of misunderstanding. What 'truth' can you really offer with the constraints of the channeling format, considering the biases of the reader? Each word used has a slightly different meaning and emphasis placed in the reader's mind.
As far as Ra being fallible, sure. To merely put concepts to words is to necessarily, automatically become fallible. The key or art with effective communication is to reduce the chance of misunderstanding. What 'truth' can you really offer with the constraints of the channeling format, considering the biases of the reader? Each word used has a slightly different meaning and emphasis placed in the reader's mind.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)