(07-20-2011, 08:52 PM)zenmaster Wrote: I'm interested in seeing the consciousness changes as yellow-ray goes into potentiation. The catalyst should be interesting because one would have to 'fall back on' something other than the collective energy ('social memory') as supported in yellow-ray and/or find support in the new green-ray. If we knew the dependencies we can probably predict the reaction. Ra even said people would fall back to orange, rather than move up to green. This would be a regression.This regression concept is interesting to think about. It does seem that there is more tolerance of others growing, but I also think others are simply just giving up because they recognize culture to be waning while also being too busy with themselves. I see society becoming more novel and appreciative of the individual because of acceptance, and on the flip-side others will simply secede, acknowledging culture of the past as a lost cause. And considering that most are going to repeat third density, what does that say about what is to come? Many like to think that a high degree of cooperation may form under great change, but how soon if most will reject green ray? It seems that a divide will form wherein the majority of those creating change will come from the younger generations, because the older generations will simply reject many of the virtues of community.
"Those reverting to orange ray, and we may add these are many upon your plane at this time, are those who feel the vibrations of true color green and, therefore, respond by rejecting governmental and societal activities as such and seek once more the self."
We see this building, and I have always believed the truth movement to be a purposely divisive one (or perhaps it is naturally the result of yellow-ray potentiation, though I don't doubt it is manipulated for emphasis). The truth movement places importance on protecting the individual at all costs and likes to be wary of the notions of community. The idea of world-government conveniently allows progressive ideas to be rejected, and so separation is always invoked under the guise of protecting the individual.
The individual will conveniently be required to make the Choice..no sitting on the fence anymore.