07-18-2011, 10:25 PM
(07-18-2011, 08:33 PM)3DMonkey Wrote:Nothing stated directly, as far I know. I wouldn't call it a 'pecking order', and there are other circumstances which would make the native planet and/or system undesirable or not as desirable compared to earth.(07-18-2011, 07:50 PM)zenmaster Wrote:This makes sense with the assumption that positive 4D transplants come here based on the idea that their home planets are unsuitable for their vibrations. This is an assumption. Is there an indication in the material that the choice of planetary sphere has a pecking order starting with the current one of incarnation?(07-16-2011, 12:34 PM)Raman Wrote: In a negative harvest there is no opportunity for even a small percentage of positives since it is not possible to polarize positively since that requires 'certain degree of self-determination'. In this case, I'm not sure about 'earth changes' but possibly is gradual with a planetary wide dictatorship at the beginning of 4d neg.I'm not sure this is a true statement. It seems that you are taking the statement of no possibility to polarize positively, in a negative environment, statement, with regards to the higher densities and applying that to third density.
My understanding is that a positive harvest on a planet with a net negative social complex (logos) is not only possible, but common. I am using that case to explain all of the recently-harvested, positive 4D transplants from other logoi that are coming to earth to begin their 4th density. The only other case that would seem to explain this need to transfer to another logoi, is the case where their home planet could not support 4D positive vibrations - due to destruction, for example. Which presumably would be much more uncommon.