07-18-2011, 03:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-18-2011, 04:08 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(07-18-2011, 11:49 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I've read many places about the quarantine lifting in 2012. Is there word on how we won't be invaded by negative ET's once that happens?The last I heard on that was in a post by David Wilcock in China's October Surprise II: Earth's "Quarantine" Has Lifted.
As a caveat, DW seems to be promoting the idea of imminent disclosure of ETs that smacks of manipulation to me. It is as if two different negative factions are working against each other to create either a false-flag "Alien Invasion" scenario or alternatively an "Alien Rescue" scenario.
Both of these are bunk, IMO. Any alien who steps off of a "spaceship" better clearly identify who they are, and where they came from. I am somewhat skeptical of the idea of ANY kinds of physical being traveling throughout interstellar space in ginormous metallic ships. If said ships exist, I contend they must have been manufactured here on earth, or underground, or possibly on the Moon or Mars.
Bottom line: The only help to humanity that -I- want to hear from any supposed ET/alien/god is to point to the fact that we already have all the solutions we need right here, right now.
Alien gods may have started this whole mess, but it is up to humanity to fix it ourselves. Intervention is the problem, not the solution.
(07-17-2011, 10:58 PM)unity100 Wrote: apparently the quarantine on this planet was going to be light, and apparently this seems to be default quarantine form for planets. (since we dont have any other information, i am assuming that all 3d planets are quarantined in this manner from start of 3d, since it seems to be implies that).
Interesting. I how said Guardians wouldn't have known about this ahead of time. At the very least, that would demonstrate that the Guardians are not, in fact, infallible. Also, you may have missed my earlier comment/question. Do you think that the Guardians are/were all in agreement about how to handle the situation? Or is/was there conflict among them?
Quote:at a point, an orion vehicle was able to pass through quarantine, circa 1600 BC, through random window effect. Ra says this was a manifestation that was governed by the guardian's future selves. then again we are seeing the passage of this vehicle tied to the choices and behavior of guardian entities.
Do we know for sure that this was a physical craft?
Quote:it is possible that the calling meets the random window effect. ie, the nature of need/calling on the planet fits the vibration model of the entities coming to meet it. (it is quite likely since they could very well exploit the deficiencies yahweh introduced genetically and socially). however, this would mean that physical entities which were physically able to come and penetrate this veil, (or entities that had the expertise and good fortune to penetrate the veil through other means - astral passage of the 5d entity -) were the ones answering this call.
See, this scrambles my brains. Why would the "game" so to speak be set up so that a given 3D entity does not have everything it needs to evolve without having to make the "call" to some other power?
Quote:i see this system as exceedingly wrong.
Wrong? To what standard of conduct would one be able to adjudicate its "wrongness"? Perhaps you mean ineffective?
Quote:this includes any call. not only negative calls. actually, even positive calls.
I see what you are saying, although I am confused on the "calling". By what mechanism would a physical entity living on a planet on the other side of the galaxy perceive such a "call"? And moreover, what would prompt them to leave their own immediate sphere of influence to trek out across the galaxy in a space ship?
Quote:this seems to have been the case, even if (maybe) in a rather excessive manner, in Ra's experience. and the logos (or whomever decided to make the veil on this planet heavier) seems to have decided to make that veil heavier to facilitate 'free will'.
Assuming that is true, how does this view make you feel toward the logos?
Quote:the word rape is carefully chosen there and it serves more than the purpose it seems to be serving - making subconscious connection harder makes the entity unable to move more heavily according to the choices its subconscious would offer, due to heavy veiling, and conscious and subconscious are tied to male and female aspects, respectively.
Frankly, I'm surprised your choice of words hasn't resulted in the hopeless derailing of this thread as of yet. But I see what you mean.