(07-17-2011, 12:00 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: it's possible that the post in question was misworded and what was meant to be said was "to be STS is to not love yourself" rather than the other way around, which, as you point out, is fairly obviously inaccurate.However, if that is indeed what was meant to be said, then what about:
26.31: "This is due to the sincere belief of fourth-density negative that to love self is to love all. Each other-self which is thus either taught or enslaved thus has a teacher which teaches love of self."
50.5: "Those negatively harvestable will be found at this time endeavoring to share their love of self."
69.13: "Let us say that the positively polarized individual makes a poor student of the love of self"
"85.11 Questioner: Then the service-to-others* path has potentiated that which is not. Could you expand that a little bit so that I could understand it a little better?
Ra: I am Ra. If you see the energy centers in their various colors completing the spectrum you may see that the service-to-others* choice is one which denies the very center of the spectrum; that being universal love. Therefore, all that is built upon the penetration of the light of harvestable quality by such entities is based upon an omission. This omission shall manifest in fourth density as the love of self; that is, the fullest expression of the orange and yellow energy centers which then are used to potentiate communication and adepthood."
Now that may be a semantic issue again, but it also does beg the question does one truly know what they are talking about with regards to this matter.