07-17-2011, 12:00 AM
(07-16-2011, 06:12 PM)zenmaster Wrote: But again, lack of love of self is still not necessarily STS, even if it's lack of 'green ray'. There is no 'STS' without sufficient polarity. And that polarity is rare. You can't 'love' what you have not yet individuated from the logos. Absence of love, any type of love, is obviously not necessarily STS. That is not a semantic issue.
Further, most people are not capable of green-ray love. So you would call them STS? No, I don't think so.
Don't disagree. It's just that it's possible that the post in question was misworded and what was meant to be said was "to be STS is to not love yourself" rather than the other way around, which, as you point out, is fairly obviously inaccurate.