It seems in that response Ra is referring to making observations of that which the student does not see. So it devalues the experience and polarization of the learner coming to conclusions for themselves. "We are quite agreed to comment upon all observations that the student may make. We cannot speak further than this for any student."
I imagine that holds more sway in communication across densities, where significant concepts are being taught and the likelihood of a teacher influencing a student. Here in 3D though, in our interactions it is said we are to teach what we know which involves challenging other people's viewpoints. In a spiritual forum like this, I find it to be more acceptable since we are here to pursue truths. There seems to be an overbearing quality which approaches the trespassing concept, which usually involves getting caught up in the details of how someone explains their thoughts. We all think differently, and as long as the fundamental concepts are clear it's helpful to allow a persons opinion on the details to be acceptable (unless of course the details are fundamental). You have to let someone work through their own thoughts and disagreements, otherwise the learning/polarization isn't as great. Out in the real-world though, I've learned that if you find yourself trying to convince someone of your perspective it's better to just let it be. So if you offer what you know, and there is disagreement, then that is an indication of learning not desired at that moment.
I imagine that holds more sway in communication across densities, where significant concepts are being taught and the likelihood of a teacher influencing a student. Here in 3D though, in our interactions it is said we are to teach what we know which involves challenging other people's viewpoints. In a spiritual forum like this, I find it to be more acceptable since we are here to pursue truths. There seems to be an overbearing quality which approaches the trespassing concept, which usually involves getting caught up in the details of how someone explains their thoughts. We all think differently, and as long as the fundamental concepts are clear it's helpful to allow a persons opinion on the details to be acceptable (unless of course the details are fundamental). You have to let someone work through their own thoughts and disagreements, otherwise the learning/polarization isn't as great. Out in the real-world though, I've learned that if you find yourself trying to convince someone of your perspective it's better to just let it be. So if you offer what you know, and there is disagreement, then that is an indication of learning not desired at that moment.