More Positive but Less Harvestable

[Tenet Nosce]

'let them be' as long as they dont break others seems to be the necessity.

Agreed. Well some way or another it looks like we arrive at the same bottom line. And getting back to the war subtheme, the resistance to 'let them be' is what results in war on a mass scale. At least, I think? :-/

You've got some great info in that post which I want to consider more thoroughly. On the timing issue, though I can already say that

We have difficulty dealing with your time/space. There may again be errors of this type.

is what caused me to question the numbers given in that, and the later query you also linked to.

So I do think that is still up in the air, and I don't see why looking to history to in an attempt to link some of the events is automatically out just because the numbers don't line up.

As you know, the numbering system has been changed multiple times resulting in all manner of confusion. Not to mention whatever clarity or lack thereof was in the mind of the channel at the time of the contact.

---

Um...Can you elaborate? Whom am I making excuses for? I'm a Ron Paul supporter. I champion individual rights. So I have no clue what you're referring to.

I guess I'm doing a horrible job with this one. You referred to the doctor who misdirected you. Your animal rights activist friends who think you don't go far enough. I'm not saying you do it. By "make excuses" I mean go along with it, I guess. It doesn't really matter I suppose.

Gosh, not at all! But the difference between your approach and mine, from what I gleaned from your earlier post about just "waiting for 4D and sorting it out then" is that I believe in action. I believe that we make it happen, to a degree. We are part of the equation. Our actions might trigger the tipping point that results in that one strong, fine moment of transformation.

Hrmmm. So yeah.. then what I've been trying to get at is this: What actions could we take that are the most congruent? There are so many issues and everybody is divided among them. Can't we put some details aside for the moment and focus on the root cause? The illusion of separation...

How shall we treat each other?

All is One. We are all connected. Therefore how one treats another is a reflection of how one treats oneself...

How shall we live?

All is One. All is life. Expressing itself in an infinite variety of ways, none greater than another...

What shall we eat?

All is One. All is Life. Through eating we share in the connectedness of all things...

[Shall, not should. A seemingly miniscule point.] :idea:

I'm not saying we have to agree on everything. Goodness, no! I am suggesting we might want to try starting from the same place and seeing how that conversation turns out.

What can we agree upon? Rather than what do we disagree upon?

What are we for? Rather than what are we against?

How did you get the idea that I thought it was ok to force one's will upon another?

I didn't. I think some zealots, however, do. (You not being one of them.)

I don't understand your question. I quoted the parts I was responding to, and used the '...' as a placeholder to show that I left some of your comments out. What are you asking?

I was asking for your opinion on the three statements represented by the ... Yea? Nay? Irrelevant?