More Positive but Less Harvestable

[Monica]

I am not trying to make anybody "wrong" for trying to change the world in a better way. I am just saying pay attention to the "way" that some people go about it... that will have some RA-mifications later on in mid 4th density that one would do well to consider.

Of course!

All of these various causes are going to eventually have to be reconciled in a harmonious way...? Yes?

Absolutely!

Bring4th_Monica, you seem like you have a balanced head on your shoulders.

Thanks! Coming from you, that means a lot to me!

And we know how much you care for the animals. I just don't understand why it is so easy in your mind to make excuses for those who "go way too far in the direction of control". Honestly, I think those folks are getting more in the way of the "cause", than helping it. I really do..

Um...Can you elaborate? Whom am I making excuses for? I'm a Ron Paul supporter. I champion individual rights. So I have no clue what you're referring to.

Some work for peace, others work to champion the oppressed (whether those 'oppressed' be cancer victims, rape victims, victims of war, gays, animals, unborn babies, or whatever). By championing the oppressed, by necessity they must tell the oppressors to stop oppressing, thereby "telling them how to live."

congruent with this:

Could your planet polarize towards harmony in one fine, strong, moment of inspiration? Yes, my friends. It is not probable; but it is ever possible.

So.... ? I really am confused. It looks to me that you have given up on possible, and went for probable.

Gosh, not at all! But the difference between your approach and mine, from what I gleaned from your earlier post about just "waiting for 4D and sorting it out then" is that I believe in action. I believe that we make it happen, to a degree. We are part of the equation. Our actions might trigger the tipping point that results in that one strong, fine moment of transformation.

How does "telling someone how to live" help one polarize more positively? Doesn't that open up the door for negative manipulation? Forcing one's will upon another.

How did you get the idea that I thought it was ok to force one's will upon another?

All things, all of life, all of the creation is part of one original thought.

Sure. That's nice. But it's just philosophical. That's like saying, "Let's all just agree that love is the key." It doesn't address the application of said philosophy.

In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.

Sure. But that is one quote among many. All must be reconciled. What about the quotes in which Ra declined the offer of STS? One single quote cannot sum up the entire Law of One.

I do think it is very odd/strange/interesting/curious that so much conversation I see going on in this forum seems to ignore the above paragraph, which is pretty much the most developed statement of the Law of One that we have available to us.

No right or wrong? Oh certainly Ra couldn't have meant that literally. No, no, no. That wouldn't make any sense. Oh no, there is DEFINITELY right or wrong. Ra just didn't get into that because they wanted to hurry up and tell us about the coming earth changes. :-/

That quote is important. But so are the quotes about polarity. All must be taken into consideration, together.

Please see Strictly Law of One > Acceptance and Will which delves deeply into this issue.

Also, just want to go on record that the "..." in your quote, I feel is important. Do you have a comment on the "..." or do we concur on that?

I don't understand your question. I quoted the parts I was responding to, and used the '...' as a placeholder to show that I left some of your comments out. What are you asking?

Edit: Referenced link has been corrected.