(06-28-2011, 07:43 PM)seejay21 Wrote: What i'm saying in my example is Ra never states that Hitler was STS. Yet we here everyday give people this "label".
then what you are saying is, excuse me, but incorrect. you again made a grand statement, this time saying that Ra 'never' mentioned that adolf hitler was sts.
http://lawofone.info/results.php?categor...&sc=1&ss=1
Quote:7.14 Questioner: I’ll just ask about Orion. You said that Orion was the source of some of these contacts with UFOs. Can you tell me something of that contact, its purpose?
Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, a simple example of intentions which are bad/good. This example is Adolf. This is your vibratory sound complex. The intention is to presumably unify by choosing the distortion complex called elite from a social memory complex and then enslaving, by various effects, those who are seen by the distortion as not-elite. There is then the concept of taking the social memory complex thus weeded and adding it to a distortion thought of by the so-called Orion group as an empire. The problem facing them is that they face a great deal of random energy released by the concept of separation. This causes them to be vulnerable as the distortions amongst their own members are not harmonized.
Quote:This entity followed the pattern of negative polarization which suggests the elite and the enslaved, this being seen by the entity to be of an helpful nature for the societal structure. However, in drifting from the conscious polarization into what you may call a twilight world where dream took the place of events in your space/time continuum, this entity failed in its attempt to serve the Creator in an harvestable degree along the path of service to self. Thus we see the so-called insanity which may often arise when an entity attempts to polarize more quickly than experience may be integrated.
seejay, really.
either you havent read the material in full, or..... i dont know what to say at this point.
ill cease discussing with you, since apparently you either havent read what you are talking about so surely, or, forgot. there is no point in discussing this with you at this point, since you apparently dont remember a lot of things. else, this will deteriorate into the format in which you will make grand statements, and i will have to find and show you q/as, which is unfruitful.
out of respect, i will finish replying this post, and i may reply to you in case you wish to bring whatever particular personal situation is causing you to not only react to this in this manner, but also make grand statements to the contrary to what we already read in the material. however, i wont reply to you in regard to material if you discuss as such, since you dont remember a lot of things.
Quote:I say that judging others is something you should refrain from, because it will take you further away from the truth. If there isn't a Ra quote for this, it is because the question wasn't asked.
there is little difference in judging 'others' or judging thoughts. all are part of infinite intelligence, and its central logos - what you call 'the creator'.
and, additionally, a quote was especially given, warning that 4 d entities' judgments about OTHERS is not too strong, and they are prone to mistakes, ending up with wrong people.
Quote:List a few, I'll tell you what i think about them. What someone does as being of negative polarity, someone else could do the exact same thing, and be of positive polarity. Dicern that.
you cannot enslave others and be of positive polarity. period. i dont know how finer this can be put.
you should read entire book 2 and 3. i dont have the time to elaborate on the paths of positive, negative and their preferences in book-size volumes here.
Quote:opps. what i mean is the judgement of other beings. Where is the quote that says we should look at all other beings under the microscope, and tatoo a label on their foreheads with our findings?
you should look at all other beings under the microscope, tattoo a label on their foreheads as to their character, and THEN decide what you will do about it - accept, or reject.
ignorance is not polarization. unawareness is not love.
Quote:exactly! It doesn't say anything about Judgement and Judging others! it is the OPPOSITE!
it doesnt say the opposite either. excuse me, but i started to think you are trying to have some fun.
Quote:It doesn't matter what anyone else does. You aren't being graded or measured against anyone but yourself.
first, the above sentence doesnt make sense. 'measured against yourself' -> what ? even the existence of a creation in which more than 1 entity is present is possible with the presence of more than one entity interacting with each other.
you are being measured against a light source, to discern whether you are emitting 51%, or holding 95%.
and for that, you are polarizing against others, which are in different orientations towards you. if you insist on ignoring the nature of what catalyst you are receiving in the form of other people's attitudes, it wont polarize you - it will just make the catalyst keep coming, and repeating until you consciously or subconsciously are aware, and decide to do something with it.
.............
at this point i will cease discussing with you on the grounds that i have explained, recommending you re-read (in case you actually read) books 2 and 3.
thank you.
(06-28-2011, 07:43 PM)seejay21 Wrote: It doesn't matter what anyone else does. You aren't being graded or measured against anyone but yourself.
..."You cannot remember your hand, their hands, perhaps even the rules of this game. This game can only be won by those who lose their cards in the melting influence of love, can only be won by those who lay their pleasures, their limitations, their all upon the table face up and say inwardly: “All, all of you players, each other-self, whatever your hand, I love you.” This is the game: to know, to accept, to forgive, to balance, and to open the self in love. This cannot be done without the forgetting, for it would carry no weight in the life of the mind/body/spirit being-ness totality"
It doesn't say in here, and decide if they are sts or sto before showing them your hand...
please read the quotes that you are going to present in support of your perspective before posting. you arent even aware that the very thing you are posting, is contradicting your argument.