More Positive but Less Harvestable

[seejay21]

The idea that any of you can be the judge of someone else being "sts" or "sto" is seriously distorted. How can any of you be so bold to decide who is and who isn't harvestable based on your tiny little view of the universe?

maybe they are daring to do that, with the information they have been given ?

we were given guidelines and information about what constitutes positive behavior, what constitutes negative behavior.

and even, how you can recognize an entity which would be harvestable.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...=1&ss=1#15

17.15 Questioner: I would like to make a point clear now that I am sure of myself. The people of this planet, following any religion or no religion at all, or having no intellectual knowledge at all of the Law of One, can still be harvested into the fourth density if they are of that vibration. Is that not correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. However, you will find few who are harvestable whose radiance does not cause others to be aware of their, what you may call, spirituality, the quality of the mind/body/spirit complex distortion. Thus, it is not particularly probable that an entity would be completely unknown to his immediate acquaintances as an unusually radiant personality, even were this individual not caught up in any of the distortions of your so-called religious systems.

that is totally leaving aside the fact that, positive, negative were defined, and examples of positive and negative paths were given.

.............

personally, i think you are the one using rather bold words in talking about this matters, since it thoroughly ignores any of the important information we were given.

but more importantly, how are you going to follow a positive path, without knowing what positive is, and a negative path, without knowing what negative is ?

by not knowing, not talking, not thinking the knowledge that was given about these ?

then there is no point in reading any part of the Ra material. [/i]

Nowhere in the LOO have I found Ra stating anything conclusively about anyones sts/sto orientation. The closest thing might be Hitler in which Ra states "..followed the pattern of negative polarization.." but refrains from actually saying that he was STS. So I don't know what you mean by discussing this material, as Ra NEVER says anything about judging others all day long. I would conclude that you aren't discussing the LOO at all, as this is never discussed in the LOO.

As far as the quote you reference, the part that needs more respecting is "Thus, it is not particularly probable that an entity would be completely unknown to his immediate acquaintances". I don't know any of us could be so bold to label hitler, patton, george bush or any of the others we judge as sts if we don't even know them as a long distance acquaintance.

Yes, my words are bold, as we have moved far away from what the LOO is here to teach us, such as this:

http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?ses...c=1&ss=1#7

Where does it say in the LOO "knowledge base" say that we should insashibly judge others. The word "Judgement" does not show up in the LOO even once.

<quote>
26.8 Questioner: Can you tell me about what percentage is of Orion influence in both the Old and New Testaments?

Ra: I am Ra. We prefer that this be left to the discretion of those who seek the Law of One.<b> We are not speaking in order to judge. Such statements would be construed by some of those who may read this material as judgmental. We can only suggest a careful reading and inward digestion of the contents.</b> The understandings will become obvious.
</quote>