06-21-2011, 11:24 AM
(06-21-2011, 10:09 AM)3DMonkey Wrote:(06-21-2011, 09:55 AM)Bring4th_GLB Wrote: Or perhaps the green-ray entity in its natural naivete will desire to not enter the doorway of harvest because it so loves (read: love without wisdom) the other non-harvestable selves that it opts to stay and serve on.
This is what causes a Wanderer to become one in the first place.
This is producing smoke in the brain. A tough question to consider. Here are the thought forms I've managed to generate. May be less than adequate to the task.
The desire to serve is present in the polarized entities in densities three through six, as far as I understand. It is in this desire that the higher-density entity chooses to become and to play the role of wanderer.
Is it the same desire to serve of the green-ray entity who at harvest chooses not to be harvested?
I guess that they are very much in the same ballpark. I think Ra described the 150-person group in S. America as being wanderers of a sort. Both groups undergo a forgetting, both undertake sacrifice, and both risk becoming karmically involved.
So perhaps I overemphasized the role of love without wisdom in the decision to not be harvested.
(06-21-2011, 09:55 AM)Bring4th_GLB Wrote: Ra: "Those of us which had the gift of polarity felt deep compassion for those who seemed to dwell in darkness. ... There was every attempt made to reach out with whatever seemed to be needed. However, those upon the positive path have the comfort of companions and we of Ra spent a great deal of our attention upon the possibilities of achieving spiritual or metaphysical adepthood or work in indigo ray through the means of relationships with other-selves. Consequently, the compassion for those in darkness was balanced by the appreciation of the light.
(06-21-2011, 10:09 AM)3DMonkey Wrote: 'I'd really love to stay and help, but that sunset is too beautiful to pass up'?
I think that this statement, "I'd really love to stay and help, but that sunset is too beautiful to pass up" really depreciates the meaning of what Ra conveys.
As humor it is great! (If that was the intention.) But as something which attempts to capture the nature of the situation I believe it a serious misapprehension.
Ra's "appreciation for the light" is not an attachment to a colorful sunset, or pretty butterfly, or Friday night plans. The light of which they speak is the light of metaphysical truth, the deepening realization/awareness of the unity of all creation.
This perspective which "appreciates the light" begins to consciously recognize the Source which underlies all outer forms, and thusly moves closer to that attitude expressed in the opening statement of "A Course in Miracles" which goes, "Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. Herein lies the peace of God."
The light of wisdom begins to understand the dance, and in that understanding the outer forms become less solid, less isolated, less independent, and more transparent to the infinite One within which they arise and fall in their temporary, time-bound sojourns into and out of form.
Wisdom can see how to most effectively/efficiently move within the dance because it begins to understand the movement, how certain energies behave, how they interact with other energies, how those energies might be aided to achieve their full potential, how they may be transformed into higher energies, how to avoid blocking suppressing and fragmenting those energies, etc.
But again this understanding of the movement happens by virtue of the larger understanding of the Context within which that movement happens, by grasping the illusory nature of the movement, and by becoming directly aware of the One (eminently present within the self and within all things).
So while the desire to serve was present in Ra, their "appreciation for the light" informed them of the nature of this dance and of the increased possibility for even greater service by becoming the Creator.
In oneness,
GLB
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi