Soul names

[Lavazza]

This isn't trivial matter. You cannot just start thinking on quantum physics, come to a point that you don't understand and then conclude the whole system must be bonkers. The assumption being that if you do not understand it it must be nonsensical. You literally compare it to medieval thinking Taha. How about a little bit of the benefit of the doubt for these poor eggheads? These guys aren't idiots and this is a difficult concept.

I just wanted to chime in and say that I fully agree with your thoughts on the importance of Quantum mechanics. In fact, because the Quantum world exists we have free will. Without that seemingly random and potential construct we may as well be robots. I find it so fascinating that after all these years, the tree in the forest thought experiment is as important as ever. The brightest and most cutting edge scientists are finding that reality is more "new age" than most would be comfortable with.

But back on the lines of the thread's topic, I was thinking recently about Soul names and our discussion here. I feel the general idea of using our individual and unique vibration as our identity is correct. I think that's how it is when we're in higher densities or the astral planes. Maybe the idea of a soul name that you can spell out with our physical mouths and tongues is sort of like a 'step down' from a higher dimension. Similar to how a drawing of a 3D cube on paper is actually a projection (or translation) of a 3D object in to 2D. Do you follow my meaning? So the name 'Hatton' for example, is just what Hatton's vibration roughly boils down to when converted/translated in to soundwaves?

I guess this gets back to the idea of words having vibrational power. When I say "Love", "Flower" or "Baby" I am communicating a certain vibration than when I say "Loath", "Curse", etc. Yet those words are only translations of what I mean in a vibrational sense. (I believe..?)

This is indeed an interesting thread.