05-23-2011, 11:27 AM
(05-23-2011, 11:08 AM)3DMonkey Wrote: Z. Sitchin found more evidence of the 'flood' in Sumerian 'stuff'. This could be what influenced the biblical rendition.
I see no reason to doubt the story of a flood. There have been lots of floods. And primitive people, not knowing about the rest of the world, would have thought that their whole world had been flooded. And not knowing about lions in africa or tigers in India, they would have thought that saving a pair of oxen, some chickens, pigs and sheep, was saving 'all' the animals. All the animals that mattered to them, anyway!
To take that historical record of a flood, written by a primitive people, as absolutely, literally true, is, well, laughable. But it needn't be an all-or-nothing proposition. It's not like it either happened the way it was described, or not at all. We know floods happened. No problem with that. It's the idea that they saved 1 pair of every species, and that the water covered the whole planet, that is...um...how do I say this nicely?