New Bob Dean interview - Required viewing!

[3DMonkey]

More disastrous?

Isn't there plenty already to "transfer" to? Sure, it would be chaotic... on one side of the tracks, the other side would be positively enabled.

When you are presented with a transcendent figure or principle, you have an 'excuse' to transfer power of reaching that transcendence on your own with the surrogate role unconsciously recognized in the object of transference - the 'ET'. This is because you have before you a successful, manifest example of being that represents something accomplished. You 'identify' with that sufficiency, without having completed the work yourself.

So you always ask, in a compulsive manner, 'tell me' the answers. It doesn't matter that the entity is positive or of good will, there is potential avoidance of life's 'problems' or to any would-be catalyst with the expectation of answers from the ET. Just as we 'demand' that the government give us information on the nature of ET's, so we 'demand' to be spoon fed information on anything else that we think we should know. That's why 'disclosure is happening now.' is a joke - an expectation from someone that has put themselves in the passive role as a spectator.

So true.

The vast majority are looking outward for identity. If one is inclined to look from outside themselves, ET presence would only be another one on the list of things to transfer/defer to.

It is important to foster a concept of looking within. I am aware that requiring my version of Disclosure is a kind of seeking from outside. I don't hope for it though.

I think I just want all the headlines on Disclosure to vanish, and I think they would if my definition was the accepted one.