The mysterious nature of time

[zenmaster]

It is quite interesting, but not going to pay $9 to read it. It seems they are trying to explain how it came to be within their knowledge framework.

Astronomy is a 'young' science with a lot of ad-hoc theories. Larson's system has it completely backwards from the conventional view (read Universe of Motion). That is, according to Larson, young stars are red giants and old stars are blue. Globular clusters are new and spirals are old. Larson even predicted Quasars before their discovery - but of course he was not credited with it. Larson claimed there are no 'black holes' (sacrilege), but possibly just very massive neutron stars, due to no viable mechanism of degeneracy - the Chandrasekhar limit is completely bogus.

---

The four elements are metaphorical analogs of the psychological faculties that inform experience

zen, is this what you were referring to (shaded bold) --

91.34 Questioner: And finally, the Magician represents the conscious mind. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. We ask the student to consider the concept of the unfed conscious mind, the mind without any resource but consciousness. Do not confuse the unfed conscious mind with that mass of complexities which you as students experience, as you have so many, many times dipped already into the processes of potentiation, catalyst, experience, and transformation.

I see it, 'experience' and 'transformation' create 'polarization' when something of the logos is realized. It's a cycle. "In order for the Transformation of Mind to occur, one principle governing the use of the deep mind must be abandoned." Apparently, living life more 'as it is' requires less governance or self-created bureaucracy.