05-03-2011, 02:01 PM
(05-03-2011, 01:51 PM)hogey11 Wrote:(05-03-2011, 08:16 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(05-03-2011, 02:07 AM)hogey11 Wrote: My argument is that both the thought-forms and feelings are interconnected. We invent machines to answer problems we have, we adopt personal styles that instill confidence, and we perform menial tasks that serve nobody but some imaginary litmus test of success. This is 3D; confusion, meaninglessness, and diversion. This is what will go away.All goes away eventually. I think that even in 3D we have the opportunity to strive for what is actually important, and the character of this work - what we are able to know of ourselves - is what allows us to even be effective in the higher densities. If we devalue the 3D experience, we set ourselves up to dwell in that confusion, meaningless, diversion we perceive.
But by no means am I devaluing the 3rd density or its lessons. All I am saying is that in 3D moving to 4D, the density of confusion moving to the density of understanding, the way we live our lives and the way we react to catalyst will change greatly. We know the two densities are not compatible for this reason; 3D feelings and thought-forms are no longer useful in 4D, as not understanding the big picture is crucial to the effectiveness of the 3D catalyst.
Our entire world is currently set up on profit margins (there are obviously exceptions - 4D is on its way). Imagine what would need to change if we set up our society for the betterment of mankind. First, corporations would need to be dissolved, as they are given too many priorities and rights. So, there goes our retail shops, gas stations, service and supply chains... There would be no point in continuing the status quo, other than maybe for the 150 year "3D support" period that Ankh has mentioned as we build new 4D infrastructure and ensure that all have their needs mets on this planet.
I am not saying this is how it gonna be. This is how I imagine it to be. I very well may be wrong.
Personally, I think the first thing to change in our structure is the patent. I attribute all problems to this funny little creation of one person's right to control an idea.